Cal Poly Home Page
ACADEMIC PROGRAMS
Skip Navigation
Search the Academic Programs Web site
:: Academic Programs Home
:: Who We Are
:: What's New
:: Academic Policies
:: Accreditation & Program Review
:: Assessment
:: Calendar
:: Catalog
:: Curriculum Handbook
:: Forms
:: Instructionally Related Activities (IRA)
:: Special Initiatives
 
If you are having trouble viewing any of the documents on this page, download the necessary viewer from the links below.
Download Adobe Reader
Download Word Viewer
Download Excel Viewer
California Polytechnic State University
Department Title

Assessment Of Graduate Programs: Assessing the Quality of Graduate Programs

The primary focus of the assessment should be on student learning outcomes expressed as measurable behaviors using Observable Verbs for Cognitive Domain Instructional Objectives (PDF). Programs are encouraged to employ direct measures whenever possible, although indirect measures (such as alumni satisfaction) may also be used. All Master's programs incorporate a thesis, project or comprehensive exam that results in a written document that can be evaluated, preferably with a rubric. Such capstone experiences can provide an ideal basis for assessing learning outcomes and reporting results in the self-study. For example, a faculty panel could select a representative sample of student theses (or equivalent), and assess these using a scoring rubric that links directly to the educational objectives of the program. Then, the self-study might report the results as evidence of student learning in the program. Rubrics could include any, or all, applicable learning outcomes from the list below (programs may add others). Scores could be based on scale of 0-4, where 4 is excellent and 0 indicates failure to meet program expectations, as outlined in the sample rating scale for rubric scoring (see below).

Sample Masters Thesis/Project Learning Outcomes

  • Demonstrates original thinking or project design
  • Takes creative approach to issues or problems
  • Addresses a sufficiently complex problem or question
  • Articulates the problem or question clearly
  • Places problem or question in proper historical/scholarly context
  • Formulates an original hypothesis.
  • Designs and conducts relevant experiments to test hypothesis
  • Uses appropriate research methods and/or technologies
  • Shows evidence of advanced technical achievement
  • Analyzes findings in adequate depth
  • Reports findings clearly
  • Draws appropriate, reasoned conclusions from the findings
  • Similarly, samples of comprehensive exams could be assessed for evidence of learning outcomes appropriate to that capstone experience.

Sample Rating Scale for Rubric Scoring

Rating

Interpretation

4 Fully demonstrates all expected learning outcomes for this educational objective (goal) at an exemplary level
3 Substantially demonstrates learning outcomes for this educational objective (goal), although one or more learning outcomes are evidenced in a limited, though adequate, way.
2 Demonstrates most learning outcomes for this educational objective (goal) at an adequate level, with serious lack of evidence for one or more outcome.
1 Minimally achieves this educational objective, with very limited evidence of expected learning outcomes
0 Fails to demonstrate evidence for this educational objective. Indicate in the "0" code box whether it is based on NE or IR or NS where;
NE: No evidence is offered
IR: All proposed evidence is irrelevant to this objective
NS: Relevant evidence suggests the objective is clearly not met.

While the primary focus of program assessment should be the measurement of student learning outcomes, attention may also be paid to certain characteristics of graduate programs exhibited by many that are successful.